FAQs on Free Legal Aid Services: Eligibility, Application & More (PART-1)

 

Introduction

For those readers who don’t know, amongst all the bodies I work for, I am on panel of Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA) wherein I perform tasks and handle cases that are marked to my name. I have been working for DLSA since 2019 onwards and have performed over 250+ tasks and cases combined till now. Over the years there have been many instances in my career where clients and other people concerned have asked me questions pertaining to DLSA and free legal Aid, which made me question if awareness campaigns about DLSA are even working. This has eventually led me to gather some of those questions and write this blog in a question answer form, which I expect will help the readers to understand and resolve doubts about free legal aid once and for all.

I have collected 30 questions about the same and will be posting it in form of two separate blog articles. Let’s start

Ques. 1.  Am I eligible for free Legal Aid?

Ans: Every person who has to file or defend a case shall be entitled to Free legal Aid from DLSA or NALSA if that person is –

a.               a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe;

b.              a victim of trafficking in human beings or begar as referred to in Article 23 of the Constitution;

c.               a woman or a child;

d.              a mentally ill or otherwise disabled person;

e.               a person under circumstances of undeserved want such as being a victim of a mass disaster, ethnic violence, caste atrocity, flood, drought, earthquake or industrial disaster; or

f.                an industrial workman; or

g.              in custody, including custody in a protective home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (104 of 1956); or in a juvenile home within the meaning of clause (j) of section 2 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (53 of 1986) or in a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric nursing home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the Mental Health Act, 1987 (14 of 1987); or

h.              Person having annual income less than Rs. 3 Lac

i.                Senior Citizen having annual income less than Rs. 4 Lac

j.                Transgender annual income less than Rs. 4 Lac

k.              Acid Attack Victim

l.                Person infected and affected with HIV AIDS

 

Ques. 2. What all documents should I have when applying for free legal aid?

Ans: So, the general rule is to have documents to support the category under which you want to apply for free legal aid. With such documents, one must also have to file an affidavit disclosing his/her income with an ID proof such as Aadhar Card.

So, for example a man, Ramesh, wants to get free legal aid, he must carry with him an Affidavit disclosing his income, his government recognised ID Card and also the details of the case filed against him or the one he wants to file. If Ramesh is from SC/ST category, then he must also have with him such documents as recognised by the government. If Ramesh is mentally ill or disabled otherwise, he must carry documentary proofs accepted by the government.

Ques. 3. Can I get a DLSA Advocate appointed for other co-parties in my case?

Ans: “Each Pary for their Own” is the general rule. If you are eligible for free legal aid, does not necessarily mean that other parties or co-parties in a case are also eligible for the same. Each person getting the free legal aid must satisfy the DLSA for granting of the same, individually. Free legal aid cannot get carry forward. Every party mut themselves fall into one or more conditions mentioned above to be eligible for free legal aid.

For example, Two men X and Y are charged for cheating. X is from SC/ST category and hence eligible for free legal aid, whereas Y is not falling under any such brackets, hence is not eligible for free legal aid. Now because X is a millionaire, he wants his legal aid to be transferred to Y. X cannot do that. Y needs to be individually be eligible for it, or else he cannot get free legal aid.

Yes, in the given situation, if X and Y both were in jail/ imprisoned, then they both would be eligible for free legal aid regardless of the social category, income or other variables.

Ques. 4. This is the first criminal/civil case against me. Am I still eligible for free legal aid?

Ans: Absolutely. No matter if it’s the first case against you or the 100th case against you, if you fall in either of the conditions mentioned above, you are eligible for free legal aid by DLSA. And not just in cases “against you” but also in cases you want to file against someone, if you are eligible, you will get free legal aid. 

Ques. 5. The case against me is false. I worry if I engage advocate through DLSA, it would look like as if I am guilty. Does it?

Ans: Not at all. Getting a lawyer appointed in your case, whether he is private counsel or appointed by DLSA, does not make you look guilty or innocent in the eyes of law. The counsel’s job is to represent you and your case in before the court of law and not there to provide weightage or credibility to your case. It is just good sense to have an advocate represent you in a court of law who knows the basic code of conduct and demeanour of the court and laws under which you are being prosecuted, than an ordinary person represent himself who has never been to a court. 

Ques. 6. Does DLSA provide legal aid in only fresh cases or does it provide even in already pending cases?

Ans: Yes, DLSA does provide free legal aid in both types of cases, fresh cases as well as pending cases. The Authority is established to provide free legal aid to the ones who are eligible and does not discriminate between types of cases. No matter where your case is to be filed/is pending, may it be before a court or a specialised tribunal, if you are eligible for free legal aid, you can get a Legal Services Advocate(LSA)/ Legal Aid Counsel (LAC) to represent your case before such court or tribunal. 

Ques. 7. I am currently falling in eligibility criteria for DLSAs free legal aid, but what if I start earning more. Will I loose the appointed counsel if I become ineligible in future?

Ans: Legal Aid is awarded on the basis of present conditions and if they are making up for eligibility of the individual for free legal aid. The concerned Secretary of the district/ court/ tribunal makes the final call if one is eligible for free legal aid or not. It is not done on basis of what condition will be applicable or not in future. However, the concerned Secretary awarding free legal aid, may upon any application/ complaint or even Suo-moto, may or may not look into the arguments validating against grant of free legal aid anytime in future. 

Ques. 8. Can I not provide the appointed advocate with all the documents I have in my case and expect him/ her to do wonders for my side in my case?

Ans: The precondition to getting satisfactory representation in your case is one’s co-operation with their counsel. It does not matter if the counsel is private or LAC, if he/she does not have all the resources and knowhows available to defend your case that you have and the other parties counsel have, they are bound to struggle defending you. 

I have come across many such clients who think just because I am LAC, someone appointed by government, I would be having special access to documents and case files etc. because of this they do not hand me over their basic documents and case files and ask me to precure the same on my own. By doing this, if anything, they are hurting their own interest as the time for procurement of such documents will add up and will lead to pileup their case. Further those who don’t like to provide the correct and true facts of the case also end up harming themselves.    

Ques. 9. Am I legally bound to peruse the advice given by my DLSA counsel or can I get a second opinion in my case?

Ans: Advises are never an obligation. Your advocate may give you advise to do or to not do specific things, but one is free to follow them or discard them as they like till the time they are the ones who need to execute on ground. But it is always “advisable” to follow such advises given by your counsel.

You can defiantly get second opinions from other private counsels, but you cannot force the LAC to pursue such second opinions without reason. For that it is recommended you go hire the private counsel you got the opinion from and let the LAC go.

The thing is, in law, there are more than just one way to go and reach the desires results in your case. Each strategy adopted has its pros and cons. One counsel may feel better equipped to gather desired results by adapting a particular strategy which may be completely different from the one adopted by another counsel. The results will eventually be same. Have trust in your counsel and let him defend you.   

Ques. 10. Can I trust the lawyers that are appointed through DLSA?

Ans: “Sarkari hai, bekar hi hoga!” is the misconception generally present in the ones getting free legal aid for the first time. The actual reality being completely opposite to the current notion. The government through bodies like NALSA and DLSA have been making an effort to provide the best possible representation to the ones who could not afford it. For this they bring in best possible advocates, with distinct standing at Bar (i.e. experience) and with proper knowledge of the theoretical as well as practical aspects of laws.

LAC (Legal Aid Counsels) and LADC (Legal Aid Defence Counsels) are the two types of advocates that DLSA has on its disposal. Both LACs and LADCs go through a rigorous selection procedure to get appointed to their respective panels. Then both LACs and LADCs are made to go through a mandatory rigorous training process conducted by DLSA and NALSA before they are given any cases to represent. Further, these advocates are also given opportunity to participate in other training processes throughout their term of appointment so as to further refine knowledge and ability to represent DLSA clients.  How many private counsels can you remember that have gone through such a rigorous process?!

Bottomline being, not everything that government does for you have to be substandard.  

Ques. 11. Can I confess before my appointed advocate or because he is working for the Government do I need to be careful in what I tell him/her and alter/change the real facts of the case so as to stay out of trouble?

Ans: Absolutely. You can and you should present the true facts or your version of the facts in your case for your counsel to be able to represent you better in the court. A counsel appointed by government with his client also has the same fiduciary relationship that one may have with other private counsels. Their communication is inadmissible as evidence in any court of law as privileged communication so as to protect the trust and confidence between them.  He deserves to know the true facts of your case in order for him/her prepare a good case/ defence for you in your case.

Ques. 12. My DLSA Advocate is also handling other private cases on the side? Can he/she do that or do I make a complaint about this to respective authority?

Ans: Advocates empanelled to DLSA can do other private cases of other private clients as part of their practice. However, it would not be morally justified for someone to be appointed in as LAC in one of your cases and filing other matters privately for you, since inherently you are still eligible for free legal aid and you are someone who requires free legal aid. But there are cases where parties and their counsels go for such an option and there is no such restriction for them to not do it from NALSA or DLSA in this respect.

My opinion being in this regard, to stick with my morals and ethics no matter the financial gain that may come with ignoring the same. Anything and everything that is not oppose to laws and benefits the aggrieved person must be done irrespective of the monetary gain or losses.   

Ques. 13. I have this lady/ my wife getting advocates from DLSA and filing multiple cases against me and others? Can she do this? Isn’t it unfair to male members of society?

Ans: No, it isn’t. It’s a step against women oppression and towards women empowerment. Not just Women, but all the distinctively oppressed parts of the society may it be differently abled people, may it be people from SC/ST category or workmen in industries, all have a history where the people in majority have shown the tendency to deal with such sections of the society in a way where they are not termed equals. Hence when a body like DLSA empowers such sections of society with free legal aid, it’s a way of trying to make the balance of the society to be pointing in as equal rather than tipping in favour of one side or the other.

It is also true that this privilege is often seen to be misused by some people of the society in creating nuisance against other people by exploiting it as a loophole. But we have to understand that the greater good is what needs to be kept in mind when dealing with such social problems. I also believe that such people who misuse such schemes shouldn’t be allowed to use them. But for that one needs to prove the “misuse” by this person, which is entirely another ballgame in itself. Without Judicial reforms in our country, this is certainly not possible.  

Ques. 14. My opposite party already has a DLSA appointed LAC filing and arguing their case. Does this exhaust my right to claim for free legal aid?

Ans: No, certainly not. As I have said before, right to legal aid is individual right which every eligible person can claim for themselves. It does not matter who all have already availed this right in your case or in other cases. If you are eligible then you can ask for a LAC to represent you in court of law for free. Certainly, does not affect your right to claim legal aid if opposite party has already availed it.

Ques. 15. So, does that mean I can have the same LAC appointed for me as for the opposite party?

Ans: No, you can have another LAC represent you in your case other than the one already representing the opposite party. DLSA isn’t short on advocates on their panel. They can appoint each party their own counsel if the need so arises.

Having the same counsel represent both sides violates the rules of natural justice and hence cannot be done. Ideally any person who might have represented one party in a case should not be allowed to later switch sides to represent opposite party in the same trial, and this does not just apply to DLSA appointed advocates, but also to private counsels. 

More Questions to Follow in Part-2

____________________________________________________________

Sources/ References :

DLSA Website

NALSA Website

___________________________________________________________________ 

Related Blogs:

Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) & National Legal Services Authority (NALSA): Guardians of Justice

1.    Perspective Dive: Community Service as an Alternative Punishment in BNS

1.    National Lok Adalat: Bridging Justice Beyond Courtrooms With A Hint of Compassion

___________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: This Article/essay provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific cases.

Tip: If you find this Article to be of any relevance, please feel free to give your feedback to the author via commenting below. Consider following my blog. For any query or suggestions, you can email the author at support@legalprobe.in

___________________________________________________________________

Post a Comment

0 Comments

.toc-content { background-color: #f0f0f0; border: 1px solid #ccc; padding: 10px; } .toc-link { color: #000; text-decoration: none; } .toc-link:hover { text-decoration: underline; }