Up until now what we have learned through various blogs and articles is how each and every provision of The Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) works in order to get the process of securing justice streamlined and fast. But what if the complainant is not satisfied with the way the process is moving. The process might be moving very fast, but not getting the desired result or promise to secure justice to the complainant/ victim of a crime. Confused? Let’s try to understand with help of an example
Let’s say,
X is a person who got attacked by Y outside his house. During the scuffle, Y
slapped X on his face many times and then he proceeded to hit X’s arm. Due to
the adrenaline pumping during the scuffle, X did not notice the type of injury
inflicted by Y onto him, so when the police came and asked X about how did Y
attack him, he told the police that Y slapped him on his face and his arm.
Later on, when he was taken to the hospital by the police for Medico-Legal Case
report, it is found that X has his arm fractured at the place where he was hit
by Y and was not able to feel up until now because of adrenaline in his blood.
But now the police officer refuses to add this in his report.
The Police
officer while submitting the chargesheet in before the magistrate, prescribes Y
to be charged with Section 115 BNS only (Simple Hurt), while the circumstances
clearly show that 117 BNS (Grievous Hurt) is also applicable in such a
situation. What would you do in such a situation where the court, based on a
faulty police report is about to frame charges onto the accused? If done, the
court shall have charges U/S 115 (Simple Hut) made onto the accused, which in
comparison to the provision U/S 117 (Grievous Hurt) is a milder section and
hence at the time of pronouncement of judgement, cannot be upgraded into
Grievous hurt.
You cannot
file for amendment of charges as the court is yet to make the charges. There
cannot be a separate FIR for this as this is all considered as one offence.
Oral submissions alone in the court made before the Bench is unreliable in such
a situation as the courts are themselves susceptible to transfers, and the new
transferred judge may not understand the complainant in lack of any previous
order passed by his predecessor.
In such a
case, it would be apt for the complainant to file a Protest petition before the
Hon’ble Court, clearly stating that the reasons because of which the complainant/
victim has reasons to believe that the court should not blindly follow the
reasoning stated in the Police report. This will help the court notice the
errors in the conclusion drawn in the police report and will also secure a
written order from the court in this respect.
Now that
we have an idea of what a Protest petition is, lets learn more about it:
What Is a Protest Petition?
A Protest
Petition is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Code of Criminal Procedure
(CrPC) or The Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), yet it has evolved
through judicial interpretations and has become an integral part of our
criminal justice system.
Filing a
Protest petition is also a reliable and convenient option for the complainant
to highlight the flaws in a police report or any lacunas in any part of an
investigation. The police’s final report typically concludes whether the
allegations against the accused are made out or not. If the complainant
disagrees with this assessment, they have the right to challenge it through the
Protest Petition.
Purpose:
A Protest
Petition serves as an effective and expeditious mechanism for an aggrieved
party to protect their rights. It allows the complainant to raise objections to
the police investigation’s findings and present their side of the story
directly to the Magistrate.
Procedure:
The
complainant files the Protest Petition before the concerned Magistrate.
In this
representation, they express their dissatisfaction with the police report and
provide reasons why they believe the case should be proceed differently as
stated in the police report filed by the police.
The
Magistrate then considers the contentions raised in the Protest Petition. A
legal professional/ Advocate would likely be invited by the magistrate to
explain the contents of the Protest petition and also to resolve or answer any
doubts that the magistrate may have with regards to the circumstances of the
case/ law involved/ any part of the petition / implications etc.
Loose format Structure:
Complainants
often seek legal assistance to draft a well-structured and persuasive Protest
Petition. However, as the same has not been expressly provided for in any part
of the Sanhita, hence there is no specific format or case structure one needs
to follow while drafting a Protest petition. Though it is advisable to always
try to draft it as a Court application format and have the Subject include the
words “Protest Petition” clearly in it. Each deficiency in the police report
needs to be clearly and descriptively mentioned in the document. All reasons
for coming on to conclusion for rejecting the findings/ assessment as in the
police report needs to be clearly stated with future implications of such an
assessment if it is not rectified by the court.
Your
protest petition will stand its ground in the court regardless of the
formatting you choose to pick, though it is always advisable to go with the
formatting guidelines as prescribed in your State’s High Court.
Legal Implications:
The
Magistrate has the authority to accept or reject the Protest Petition. If
accepted, the Magistrate may direct further investigation, order additional
evidence, or take any other necessary steps. Rejection of the Protest Petition
does not necessarily mean the case ends; the complainant can explore other
legal avenues. He can file for amendment of charges later on in the case or any
other remedy suited for the strategy of that particular case.
Conclusion
The
Protest Petition strikes a balance between the police’s investigative role and
the complainant’s right to seek justice. It ensures that the complainant’s
voice is heard even after the police report. It is important to note here that
since a protest petition primarily targets to a Judge’s discretion, hence while
deciding a protest petition it is not mandatory for the magistrate to allow
both sides to present their arguments to the case. Magistrate may choose not to
listen to the accused’s counsel if he so desires, although fair number of
courts do listen to all sides.
Filing a
Protest Petition promptly and at the right time is crucial for any person.
Delays may affect the court’s consideration on such petition and it might just
get complicated for the complainant later on, as the case progresses.
A well drafted Protest Petition is a powerful tool for ensuring
fairness in criminal proceedings. As an advocate or aspiring legal
professional, you will play a vital role in guiding your clients through a
process like this to ensure positive outcomes in your legal battles
____________________________________________
Also Read:
Crucial Clues Unveiled: How the DAR Shapes Accident Trials
Decoding Section 163 BNSS: Urgent Orders,Nuisance, and Public Safety
Unveiling the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS): A Legal Revolution Unfolding
___________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This Article/essay provides
general information and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified
legal professional for specific cases.
Tip: If you find this Article to be of any relevance, please feel free to give your feedback to the author via commenting below. Consider following my blog. For any query or suggestions, you can email the author at support@legalprobe.in
0 Comments